[2 ]R. G. Collingwood, "The Idea of a Philosophy of Something, and in particular, a Philosophy of History," in The Idea of History, (Revised Edition), Oxford, 1993, Jan Van der Dussen ed., 337. 中译文见拙译《某某哲学的观念,尤其是历史哲学的观念》,《世界哲学》,2003年第4期。
[3 ]R. G. Collingwood, "The Idea of a Philosophy of Something, and in particular, a Philosophy of History," 337.
[4 ]R. G. Collingwood, "The Philosophy of History", in Essay in the Philosophy of History, Austin, 1965, William Debbins ed. 123.
[5 ]R. G. Collingwood, "The Idea of a Philosophy of Something, and in particular, a Philosophy of History," 346.
[6 ]R. G. Collingwood, "The Idea of a Philosophy of Something, and in particular, a Philosophy of History,",347.
[7 ]参见沃尔什:《历史哲学导论》,何兆武、张文杰译,社会科学文献出版社1991年版,第42页及以下。
[8 ]R. G. Collingwood, "The Idea of a Philosophy of Something, and in particular, a Philosophy of History," 349.
[9 ]R. G. Collingwood, "The Idea of a Philosophy of Something, and in particular, a Philosophy of History," 349.
[10] 参见柯林武德:《历史的观念》,诺克斯版,何兆武、张文杰译,商务印书馆1997年版,第34页。
[11 ]R. G. Collingwood, "The Idea of a Philosophy of Something, and in particular, a Philosophy of History," 357.
[12 ]参见Richard T. Vann,"Turning Linguistic: History and Theory and History and Theory, 1960-1975," in A New Philosophy of History, edited by Frank Ankersmit and Hans Kellner,Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1995, Pp.40-69. 中译文见拙译《转向语言学》,《哲学译丛》,1999年第3、4期。
[13 ]Richard T. Vann,"Turning Linguistic: History and Theory and History and Theory, 1960-1975," 61.
[14 ]Hayden White, Metahistory: The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe, Baltimore, 1973, 1.
[15 ]Chris Lorenz,“Can Histories be True? Narrativism, Positivism, and the ‘Metaphorical Turn’,” History and Theory 37(1998),309.
[16] 参见W. H. Dray, " On the Nature and Role of Narrative in Historiography," History and Theory,Vol. 10(1971),154.
[17] 安克斯密特很少用“历史哲学”一词,取而代之的是用“史学理论”一词,这多少与荷兰的学科设置有关,历史哲学分支学科通常设置于历史学一级学科之下称为史学理论。
[18] 安克斯密特:《为历史主观性而辩》(下),陈新译,《学术研究》2003年第4期出版。
[19] 后文有关宏大叙事的讨论将对此有详细阐述。
[20] Richard T. Vann,"Turning Linguistic: History and Theory and History and Theory, 1960-1975," 42-43.
[21 ]Ibid., 43.
[22 ]J.H.Hexter,“The Rhetoric of History,”History and Theory,Vol.6(1967), 1-13.
[23] 同上,第11页。
[24] 关于赫克斯特的评述,可参见拙文《20世纪60年代转向语言学的西方历史哲学研究》,刊于《求是学刊》,2002年第1期。
[25 ]J.H.Hexter,“The Rhetoric of History,”12.
[26] Richard T. Vann,"Turning Linguistic: History and Theory and History and Theory, 1960-1975," 43.
[27] 安克斯密特:《为历史主观性而辩》(上),陈新译,《学术研究》2003年第3期。
[28 ]Hayden White, "The Value of Narrativity in the Representation of Reality", in The Content of the Form, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1987, 1-25.中译文见拙译《叙事性在实在表现中的用处》,见于《书写历史》,上海三联书店2003年版
[29 ]Sande Cohen,“Structuralism and the Writing of Intellectual History,” History and Theory,Vol.17(1978),176.
[30] 同上,
[31] Chris Lorenz,“Can Histories be True? Narrativism, Positivism, and the ‘Metaphorical Turn’,” 329.
[32 ]J.H.Hexter,“The Rhetoric of History,”6.
[33] Ewa Domanska,Encounters:Philosophy of History after Postmodernism,Charlottesville and London, 1998, 23-24.
[34 ]Leon J. Goldstein, "History and the Primacy of Knowing," History and Theory Vol.16 (1977), Beiheft. 29-52.在前一年,他出版了《历史认识》(Historical Knowing. Austin, Texas and London, 1976)一书系统阐述这种观点。
[35 ]W. H. Walsh,“Truth and Fact in History Reconsidered,” History and Theory ,Vol.16 (1977), Beiheft, 68.
[36 ]W. H. Walsh,“Truth and Fact in History Reconsidered,” 70.
[37] Jerzy Topolski, "Conditions of Truth of Historical Narratives," History and Theory 20 (1981),51.
[38 ]Jerzy Topolski, "Conditions of Truth of Historical Narratives," 59.
[39] David Carr,“Narrative and the Real World: An Argument for Continu,ity,” History and Theory , Vol.25(1986),126.
[40] David Carr,“Narrative and the Real World: An Argument for Continuity,” 128.
[41] David Carr,“Narrative and the Real World: An Argument for Continuity,” 119.
[42] 安克斯密特:《为历史主观性而辩》(上)。
[43] 可参见拙文:《论历史叙述中的主观性与历史评价》,刊于《史学理论研究》2001年第2期。
[44] 参见安克斯密特:《为历史主观性而辩》(上)、(下)。
[45] Hayden White, Metahistory, Preface, xii.
[46] 安克斯密特:《为历史主观性而辩》(下)。
[47] Ankersmit, "
[48] 安克斯密特:《为历史主观性而辩》(下)。
[49] 耶尔恩·吕森:《危机、创伤与认同》,陈新译,《中国学术》2002年第1期。
[50] 19世纪末以狄尔泰为代表的历史哲学家曾关注过这一领域,更早还可述及康德等人。
[51] W. H. Walsh,“Truth and Fact in History Reconsidered,” 55.
[52] Hans Kellner,“‘Never Again’Is Now,” History and Theory , Vol.33(1994), 129.
[53] 参见耶尔恩·吕森:《危机、创伤与认同》。
[54] 参见Lucian H?lscher,“The New Annalistic: A Sketch of A Theory of History,” History and Theory , Vol.36(1997),317-335.中译文见拙译《新编年史:一种史学理论的纲要》,《世界哲学》2003年第4期。
[55] Richard T. Vann,"Turning Linguistic: History and Theory and History and Theory, 1960-1975," 61.
[56] Richard T. Vann,"Turning Linguistic: History and Theory and History and Theory, 1960-1975," 61.
[57 ]Kerwin Lee Klein,“In Search of Narrative Mastery:Postmodernism and the Peoples without History,” History and Theory,Vol. 34(1995),276.此处译文由肖华锋、肖卫民译。
[58 ]William H. McNeill,“History and The Scientific Worldview,” History and Theory,Vol. 37(1998),13.此处译文由王利红译
[59 ]Ewa Domanska,“Universal History And Postmodernism,”Storia della Storiografia,Number 35 (1999).译文《普遍史与后现代主义》,陈新译,见《人文艺术》第2辑,贵州人民出版社2001年版。
[60 ]参见Lawrence Stone,"The Revival of Narrative : Reflections on a New Old History," Past and Present, (November 1979), No.85.
(此文为《当代西方历史哲学读本》,复旦大学出版社2004年版导论,首发于《东南学术》,2003年第6期。录入编辑:乾乾)